From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eastman Kodak v. Prometheus Funding

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 10, 2001
283 A.D.2d 216 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

May 10, 2001.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered September 5, 2000, dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered August 28, 2000, granting defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 as time-barred, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the ensuing judgment.

James M. Hirschhorn, for plaintiff-appellant.

John H. Gross, for defendant-respondent

Before: Sullivan, P.J., Williams, Andrias, Rubin, Friedman, JJ.


Defendant is sued as the successor in interest to Frank B. Hall Co., an insurance broker through which plaintiff purchased numerous excess and/or umbrella liability policies. Plaintiff alleges that Frank B. Hall mishandled claims made by it under the subject policies and that coverage was consequently denied, leaving plaintiff exposed to substantial liability. We agree with Supreme Court that plaintiff's action is time-barred.

Contrary to plaintiff's contention, the continuous representation doctrine is not applicable to insurance brokers and they are not professionals within the meaning of CPLR 214(6) (see, Chase Scientific Research, Inc. v. NIA Group, Inc., 96 N.Y.2d 20, 2001 N Y LEXIS 531).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Eastman Kodak v. Prometheus Funding

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 10, 2001
283 A.D.2d 216 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Eastman Kodak v. Prometheus Funding

Case Details

Full title:EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. PROMETHEUS FUNDING…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 10, 2001

Citations

283 A.D.2d 216 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
724 N.Y.S.2d 736

Citing Cases

Transp. Workers Union of Am. Local v. SCHWART0

Courts have declined to apply the continuous representation doctrine to insurance brokers or investment…

Pike v. New York Life Ins. Co.

Similarly, the plaintiffs' contention that the continuous representation doctrine should have tolled the…