From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Easterling v. Ohio

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Mar 11, 2013
Case No. 3:13-cv-24 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 11, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 3:13-cv-24

03-11-2013

WARREN EASTERLING Plaintiff, v. STATE OF OHIO Defendant.


District Judge Timothy S. Black

Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz


ORDER TO PRO SE PETITIONER UPON FILING OF MOTION TO

DISMISS OR MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

You are hereby notified that the Defendant filed with the Court on March 11, 2013, a motion to dismiss in this case [Doc # 12]. You should receive a copy of the motion directly from Respondent.

Under the rules of this Court (S.D. Ohio L.R. 7.2) you are allowed twenty-one days from the date of service (March 11, 2013) within which to file a response to this motion, plus an extra three days because of the way the motion was sent to you. Your response must be filed with the Court not later than April 4, 2013.

Michael R. Merz

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Easterling v. Ohio

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Mar 11, 2013
Case No. 3:13-cv-24 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 11, 2013)
Case details for

Easterling v. Ohio

Case Details

Full title:WARREN EASTERLING Plaintiff, v. STATE OF OHIO Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Mar 11, 2013

Citations

Case No. 3:13-cv-24 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 11, 2013)