From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Easterling v. Ohio

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Jan 2, 2013
Case No. 3:12-cv-300 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 2, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 3:12-cv-300

01-02-2013

WARREN EASTERLING, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF OHIO, Defendant.


Judge Timothy S. Black

Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz


ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE

MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. 16) AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR

RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT (DOC. 15)

This case is before the Court on the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz, who recommends that Plaintiff's motion for relief from judgment be denied. Neither party filed objections to the Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge and the time for doing so has expired.

As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge de novo. Following that de novo review of the issues, and absent any objection by the parties, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendations in its entirety (Doc. 16) and DENIES Plaintiff's motion for relief from judgment (Doc. 15). This case remains terminated on the docket of the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

Timothy S. Black

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Easterling v. Ohio

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Jan 2, 2013
Case No. 3:12-cv-300 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 2, 2013)
Case details for

Easterling v. Ohio

Case Details

Full title:WARREN EASTERLING, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF OHIO, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 2, 2013

Citations

Case No. 3:12-cv-300 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 2, 2013)