From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Easterling v. Ohio

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Apr 15, 2013
Case No. 3:13-cv-024 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 15, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 3:13-cv-024

04-15-2013

WARREN EASTERLING, Petitioner, v. STATE OF OHIO, Respondent.


District Judge Timothy S. Black

Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz


RECOMMITTAL ORDER

This case is before the Court on Petitioner's Objections (Doc. No. 16) to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations (Doc. No. 147). As permitted by Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, the Petitioner has filed a Response to those Objections (Doc. No. 17).

The District Judge has preliminarily considered the Objections and believes they will be more appropriately resolved after further analysis by the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3), this matter is hereby returned to the Magistrate Judge with instructions to file a supplemental report analyzing the Objections and Response and making recommendations based on that analysis.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

Timothy S. Black

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Easterling v. Ohio

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Apr 15, 2013
Case No. 3:13-cv-024 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 15, 2013)
Case details for

Easterling v. Ohio

Case Details

Full title:WARREN EASTERLING, Petitioner, v. STATE OF OHIO, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Apr 15, 2013

Citations

Case No. 3:13-cv-024 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 15, 2013)