Opinion
20-CV-2146 TWR (BGS)
09-08-2021
E.A.R.R., et al., Plaintiffs, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY “DHS”, et al., Defendants.
ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR A STAY (ECF No. 72)
Honorable Todd W. Robinson United States District Judge
Before the Court is the Parties' Joint Motion for a Stay. (ECF No. 72.) “[T]he power to stay proceedings is incidental to the power inherent in every court to control the disposition of the causes on its docket with economy of time and effort for itself, for counsel, and for litigants.” Landis v. N. Am. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254 (1936). In determining whether to issue a stay, the court considers the “possible damage which may result from the granting of a stay, the hardship or inequity which a party may suffer in being required to go forward, and the orderly course of justice measured in terms of the simplifying or complicating of issues, proof, and questions of law which could be expected to result from a stay.” CMAX, Inc. v. Hall, 300 F.2d 265, 268 (9th Cir. 1962). Here, based on the relevant n considerations discussed by the Parties, the Court GRANTS the Joint Motion. As requested, the Court stays this case for sixty (60) days. The Parties shall file an updated status report within 60 days of the date of this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.