Earl W. Baker Co. v. Denney

2 Citing cases

  1. BARBER ASPHALT CORPORATION v. INDUSTRIAL COMM. ET AL

    103 Utah 371 (Utah 1943)   Cited 11 times
    In Barber, the Industrial Commission approved a compromise between an employer and an employee, but later reopened the case when the employee made further claims.

    It has been held that a court or commission has no power to entertain proceedings for approval of an agreement as to workmen's compensation except such as is conferred by statute. Boyko v. Federated Metals Corp., 164 A. 462, 9 11 N.J. Misc. 82, affirmed 168 A. 672, 11 N.J. Misc. 807; Earl W. Baker Co. v. Denney, 158 Okla. 266, 13 P.2d 80, and that an approval of an agreement forbidden by the public policy of the state is voidable if not void. Boyko v. Federated Metals Corp., supra.

  2. Earl W. Baker Co. v. Denney

    27 P.2d 338 (Okla. 1933)

    Upon a hearing of that motion this court rendered its opinion, which appears in the official reports. 158 Okla. 266, 13 P.2d 80. Thereafter this court recalled the mandate and granted a rehearing in the cause. We are calling attention to the prior decision, contrary to our custom of not referring to decisions in which a rehearing has been granted, for the reason that the opinion has been printed in the official reports.