From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

EALY v. RUPPERT

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
Feb 12, 2009
Case No. 3:09-cv-10 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 12, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 3:09-cv-10.

February 12, 2009


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS


The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. #4), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion for Temporary Restraining Order is DENIED.


Summaries of

EALY v. RUPPERT

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
Feb 12, 2009
Case No. 3:09-cv-10 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 12, 2009)
Case details for

EALY v. RUPPERT

Case Details

Full title:Larry E. Ealy, Plaintiff, v. Judge James E. Ruppert, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton

Date published: Feb 12, 2009

Citations

Case No. 3:09-cv-10 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 12, 2009)