From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

EALY v. RUPPERT

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
Jun 6, 2009
Case No. 3:09-cv-10 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 6, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 3:09-cv-10.

June 6, 2009


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS


The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. #15), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Plaintiff timely objected to the Report and Recommendations on May 26, 2009, and is entitled to review de novo of the recommendation.

Magistrate Judge Merz recommended dismissing the case because Plaintiff had failed to make service of process on the remaining Defendants in this case within the time allowed by Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m). Plaintiff had been specifically notified well in advance of his duty to make service within that time (See Doc. No. 12).

Plaintiff's objection consists entirely of his statement that he had filed an Affidavit of Disqualification against both the undersigned and Magistrate Judge Merz in this case. No such Affidavit has been filed in this case and Plaintiff has not otherwise shown a basis for disqualification of either of these judicial officers. Even if they were disqualified, that would not give a plaintiff the privilege of ignoring Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m).

Accordingly, Plaintiff's Objections are overruled and the Report and Recommendations are adopted. The clerk will enter judgment dismissing this action with prejudice.


Summaries of

EALY v. RUPPERT

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
Jun 6, 2009
Case No. 3:09-cv-10 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 6, 2009)
Case details for

EALY v. RUPPERT

Case Details

Full title:Larry E. Ealy, Plaintiff, v. Judge James E. Ruppert, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton

Date published: Jun 6, 2009

Citations

Case No. 3:09-cv-10 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 6, 2009)