Summary
dismissing pro se complaint pursuant to § 1915(e)(B) because plaintiff's claims are barred by the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel
Summary of this case from Bridgeman v. City of Bedford HeightsOpinion
Case Number: 3:09cv117.
July 27, 2009
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Sharon Ovington filed on May 6, 2009 (Doc. 6) and June 3, 2009) Doc. 10) to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) expired May 27, 2009 and June 23, 2009, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.
Accordingly, plaintiff's complaint (Doc. 2) is DISMISSED and plaintiff's motion to proceed IFP (Doc. 7) is DENIED.
The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) that an appeal of an Order adopting the Report and Recommendation will not be taken in good faith, and consequently, leave for plaintiff to appeal in forma pauperis will be denied. If so certified, plaintiff — a non-prisoner — will remain free to apply to proceed in forma pauperis in the United States Court of Appeals. See Callihan v. Schneider, 178 F.3d 800, 803 (6th Cir. 1999).
This case is hereby is TERMINATED on the Court's docket.
IT IS SO ORDERED.