From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eagle Suspensions, Inc. v. Hellman Worldwide Logistics, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jan 20, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12-CV-0611-G (N.D. Tex. Jan. 20, 2015)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12-CV-0611-G

01-20-2015

EAGLE SUSPENSIONS, INC., Plaintiff, v. HELLMAN WORLDWIDE LOGISTICS, INC., Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge for plain error, I am of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct and they are accepted as the findings and conclusions of the court.

For the reasons stated in the findings, conclusions, and recommendation, the plaintiff is awarded $230,153.09 for its initial fee request dated April 24, 2013, and additional attorneys' fees in the amount of $127,002.38 for incurred in connection with the appeal and in litigating its fee request after the filing of its initial motion.

SO ORDERED. January 20, 2015.

/s/ _________

A. JOE FISH

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Eagle Suspensions, Inc. v. Hellman Worldwide Logistics, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jan 20, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12-CV-0611-G (N.D. Tex. Jan. 20, 2015)
Case details for

Eagle Suspensions, Inc. v. Hellman Worldwide Logistics, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:EAGLE SUSPENSIONS, INC., Plaintiff, v. HELLMAN WORLDWIDE LOGISTICS, INC.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Jan 20, 2015

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12-CV-0611-G (N.D. Tex. Jan. 20, 2015)

Citing Cases

Halprin v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp.

As before, the Court must be able to view, unobstructed, the exact billing entries detailing the work done on…

Vidal v. Kroger Tex., LP

001, despite its procedural nature, should be applied in federal diversity actions."). Plaintiff argues that…