From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eady v. Big G Express

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Dec 22, 2022
3:21-cv-00432 (M.D. Tenn. Dec. 22, 2022)

Opinion

3:21-cv-00432

12-22-2022

RONALD DWIGHT EADY, Plaintiff, v. BIG G EXPRESS, Defendants.


ORDER

WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR. CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) (Doc. No. 52) recommending the Court grant Big G Express's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 41) and dismiss the action with prejudice. Neither party filed a timely objection to the R&R. When no party objects to the R&R within 14 days of service, the Court need not independently review the matter. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985). Regardless, the Court thoroughly reviewed the R&R and agrees with its recommended disposition.

The R&R is APPROVED AND ADOPTED. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 41) is GRANTED. The action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

This is a final order. The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58 and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Eady v. Big G Express

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Dec 22, 2022
3:21-cv-00432 (M.D. Tenn. Dec. 22, 2022)
Case details for

Eady v. Big G Express

Case Details

Full title:RONALD DWIGHT EADY, Plaintiff, v. BIG G EXPRESS, Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division

Date published: Dec 22, 2022

Citations

3:21-cv-00432 (M.D. Tenn. Dec. 22, 2022)