From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eackles v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Aug 28, 2018
554 S.W.3d 915 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

WD 81011

08-28-2018

James E. EACKLES, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Natalie Hull Hoge, Assistant Appellate Defender, Kansas City, MO, Attorney for Appellant. Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, and Daniel N. McPherson, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.


Natalie Hull Hoge, Assistant Appellate Defender, Kansas City, MO, Attorney for Appellant.

Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, and Daniel N. McPherson, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.

Before Division Two: Mark D. Pfeiffer, Presiding Judge, and Lisa White Hardwick and Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Judges

Order

Per Curiam:

Mr. James Eackles appeals from the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of Buchanan County, Missouri, denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Eackles v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Aug 28, 2018
554 S.W.3d 915 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Eackles v. State

Case Details

Full title:James E. EACKLES, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Aug 28, 2018

Citations

554 S.W.3d 915 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)