From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

E.A.C. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Aug 18, 2021
322 So. 3d 1240 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 4D20-2079

08-18-2021

E.A.C., a Child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Erika Follmer, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rachael Kaiman, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Erika Follmer, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rachael Kaiman, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

ON MOTION TO CERTIFY A QUESTION OF GREAT PUBLIC IMPORTANCE

Per Curiam.

We grant the motion to certify a question of great public importance.

The supreme court has discretionary jurisdiction to review decisions of the district courts which pass upon a question certified to be of great public importance. Fla. R. App. P. 9.030(a)(2)(A)(v). The majority decision passes upon such a question. We therefore certify the following question to the supreme court as one of great public importance.

Do witnesses appearing in a juvenile adjudicatory hearing by Zoom during a global pandemic constitute a per se violation of the defendant's due process rights?

May, Ciklin, and Levine, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

E.A.C. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Aug 18, 2021
322 So. 3d 1240 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

E.A.C. v. State

Case Details

Full title:E.A.C., a Child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Date published: Aug 18, 2021

Citations

322 So. 3d 1240 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)