From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

E. J. Trum, Inc. v. Blanchard Parfums, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 3, 1969
33 A.D.2d 689 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)

Opinion

November 3, 1969


In an action to recover for goods sold and delivered and against one of the defendants, Del Laboratories, Inc., on the ground that the assets of one of the alleged purchasers were transferred to that defendant without compliance with article 6 of the Uniform Commercial Code, said transferee appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 2, 1969, which denied its motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. We are of the opinion that the transferee's complete failure to comply with the notice provisions of article 6 of the Uniform Commercial Code was tantamount to a concealment of a transfer of assets within the meaning of section 6-111 of said code. Summary judgment was properly denied, as issues of fact are present as to whether plaintiff discovered the transfer within six months before commencement of the action. Christ, Acting P.J., Rabin, Benjamin, Martuscello and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

E. J. Trum, Inc. v. Blanchard Parfums, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 3, 1969
33 A.D.2d 689 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)
Case details for

E. J. Trum, Inc. v. Blanchard Parfums, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:E. J. TRUM, INC., Respondent, v. BLANCHARD PARFUMS, INC., Defendant, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 3, 1969

Citations

33 A.D.2d 689 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)

Citing Cases

Pipeline v. Turf

. . ." Columbian Rope Co. v. Rinek Cordage Co., 461 A.2d 312 (Pa.Super. 1983); E. J. Trum Inc. v. Blanchard…

In re Gruber Industries, Inc.

The cases cited by Beacon, in its memorandum in support of its petition for review, are readily…