From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

E. Bay Rest. & Tavern Ret. Plan v. Grasswood Partners

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jun 26, 2022
2:22-cv-01462-RGK-GJSx (C.D. Cal. Jun. 26, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01462-RGK-GJSx

06-26-2022

East Bay Restaurant and Tavern Retirement Plan et al v. Grasswood Partners, Inc. et al


Present The Honorable R. GARY KLAUSNER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution

Absent a showing of good cause, an action must be dismissed without prejudice if the summons and complaint are not served on a defendant within 90 days after the complaint is filed. Fed.R.Civ.Proc. 4(m). Generally, defendants must answer the complaint within 21 days after service (60 days if the defendant is the United States). Fed.R.Civ.Proc. 12(a)(1).

In the present case, it appears that one or more of these time periods has not been met. Accordingly, the court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing by June 8, 2022, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution as to certain defendant/s.

Alternatively, the Court will consider the following a satisfactory response to the Order to Show Cause:

[] Proof of service of summons and operative complaint by as to: [List unserved defendants]
[.] Response to the Complaint by June 8, 2022, by the following defendant(s): Grasswood Partners, Inc. Dale H Stevens
-or
[.] If a defendant listed above does not respond by June 8, 2022, Plaintiff's application for entry of default by clerk pursuant to Rule 55a of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by June 10, 2022.
[] Plaintiff's motion for default judgment pursuant to Rule 55b of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as to defendant(s): [List defendants]

If a satisfactory response is not timely filed, the matter or the listed defendants will be dismissed for lack of prosecution.

Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument.


Summaries of

E. Bay Rest. & Tavern Ret. Plan v. Grasswood Partners

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jun 26, 2022
2:22-cv-01462-RGK-GJSx (C.D. Cal. Jun. 26, 2022)
Case details for

E. Bay Rest. & Tavern Ret. Plan v. Grasswood Partners

Case Details

Full title:East Bay Restaurant and Tavern Retirement Plan et al v. Grasswood…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jun 26, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-01462-RGK-GJSx (C.D. Cal. Jun. 26, 2022)