Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§

Dyer v. Rich

259 F. Supp. 736 (N.D. Miss. 1966)
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
Dyer v. Rich

4 Citing cases

  1. Terk v. Ruch

    655 F. Supp. 205 (D. Colo. 1987)   Cited 8 times
    Upholding 10% cap on nonresident recreational hunting permits for sheep and goat in Colorado and commenting that "[m]ore than twenty states either allocate their licenses unevenly, or completely prohibit nonresidents from hunting certain species"

    What authority exists on this question suggests that three-judge district courts had no greater authority than conventional district courts. Dyer v. Rich, 259 F. Supp. 736, 740 (N.D.Miss. 1966) (actions of three-judge court must be regarded as actions of conventional district court), Osage Tribe of Indians v. Ickes, 45 F. Supp. 179 (D.D.C. 1942), aff'd 133 F.2d 47 (D.C. Cir.), cert. denied, 319 U.S. 750, 63 S.Ct. 1158, 87 L.Ed. 1704 (1943) (three-judge court has all powers of district court). Nothing in the legislative history of the repeal of 28 U.S.C. § 2281 suggests that three-judge district courts had more authority than conventional district courts.

  2. Red Bird v. Berry

    371 F. Supp. 730 (W.D. Okla. 1973)   Cited 1 times

    Fourth Circuit — Tyrone, Inc. v. Wilkinson (C.A.4 Va.), 410 F.2d 639, cert. den., 396 U.S. 985, 90 S.Ct. 477, 478, 24 L.Ed.2d 449; Chester v. Kinnamon (D.C.Md.), 276 F. Supp. 717; Rakes v. Coleman (D.C.Va.), 318 F. Supp. 181. Fifth Circuit — Dyer v. Rich (D.C. Miss.), 259 F. Supp. 736; Smith v. State Executive Committee of Democratic Party (D.C.Ga.), 288 F. Supp. 371; Rodriguez v. Brown (D.C.Tex.), 299 F. Supp. 479, supp.op. 300 F. Supp. 737; McMichen v. State Board of Bar Examiners (D.C.Ga.), 305 F. Supp. 1221; Milner v. Burson (D.C.Ga.), 320 F. Supp. 706. Sixth Circuit — Original Fayette County Civil Welfare League, Inc. v. Ellington (D.C.Tenn.), 309 F. Supp. 89 (by implication); Cholmakjian v. Board of Trustees (D.C.Mich.), 315 F. Supp. 1335.

  3. Carr v. Brazoria County, Texas

    341 F. Supp. 155 (S.D. Tex. 1972)   Cited 10 times

    In such a case the attack is aimed at an allegedly erroneous administrative action. Cf. Dyer v. Rich, 259 F. Supp. 736 (N.D.Miss. 1966); Pervis v. LaMarque Independent School District, 328 F. Supp. 638 (S.D.Tex. 1971). It follows that this is not a three-judge court case.

  4. Klim v. Jones

    315 F. Supp. 109 (N.D. Cal. 1970)   Cited 64 times
    In Klim v. Jones, 315 F. Supp. 109 (N.D.Cal. 1970), the California's Innkeeper's Lien Law was found violative of procedural due process in its "failure to provide for any sort of hearing prior to the imposition of the... lien thereunder."

    E. g., Spielman Motor Sales Co. v. Dodge, 295 U.S. 89, 55 S.Ct. 678, 79 L.Ed. 1322 (1935); Bell v. Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor, 279 F.2d 853 (2d Cir. 1960); Valtierra v. Housing Authority of San Jose, 313 F. Supp. 1 (N.D.Cal. 1970); Lazarus v. Faircloth, 301 F. Supp. 266, 270 (S.D.Fla. 1969); Hyden v. Baker, 286 F. Supp. 475, 481 (M.D.Tenn. 1968); Dyer v. Rich, 259 F. Supp. 736, 739 (N.D.Miss. 1966). B. Jurisdiction