From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dyer v. Lewis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Dec 11, 2012
No. 3:10-0019 (M.D. Tenn. Dec. 11, 2012)

Opinion

No. 3:10-0019

12-11-2012

MAURICIO DYER, Plaintiff, v. NORMAL LEWIS, et al., Defendants.


Chief Judge Haynes


ORDER

Upon review of the file in this action, Plaintiff has not secured service of process on the Defendant and on March 22, 2010, Plaintiff received notice of the unexecuted return of summons. (Docket Entry No. 9). Plaintiff has not taken any further measures to pursue this action.

Accordingly, pursuant to Local Rule 41.01 and Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), this action is DISMISSED for Plaintiff's failure to prosecute.

It is so ORDERED.

_______________

WILLIAM J. HAYNES, JR.

Chief Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Dyer v. Lewis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Dec 11, 2012
No. 3:10-0019 (M.D. Tenn. Dec. 11, 2012)
Case details for

Dyer v. Lewis

Case Details

Full title:MAURICIO DYER, Plaintiff, v. NORMAL LEWIS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Dec 11, 2012

Citations

No. 3:10-0019 (M.D. Tenn. Dec. 11, 2012)