From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dye v. Dye

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
May 30, 2000
18 S.W.3d 555 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. ED 76626

May 30, 2000

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY; JOSEPH A. GOEKE, III, JUDGE.

Aaron S. Dubin, Clayton, for appellant.

Elliott Hoyt Dye, Granite City, Il, pr se.

Before Richard B. Teitelman, P.J., Clifford H. Ahrens and Lawrence E. Mooney, JJ.


Brenda Louis Dye appeals the trial court's denial of her motion to modify the parties decree of dissolution. We find the judgment is supported by substatial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b)(1).


Summaries of

Dye v. Dye

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
May 30, 2000
18 S.W.3d 555 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Dye v. Dye

Case Details

Full title:BRENDA LOUISE DYE, Appellant, v. ELLIOTT HOYT DYE, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: May 30, 2000

Citations

18 S.W.3d 555 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)