From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Duty v. Toyota Advanced Logistics

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
May 16, 2022
278 A.3d 307 (Pa. 2022)

Opinion

No. 529 EAL 2021

05-16-2022

Patricia DUTY and Debra Miller, Individually and as Administrators of the Estate of Jennifer Wright, Petitioners v. TOYOTA ADVANCED LOGISTICS, Bastian Solutions, Peach State Integrated Technologies, Toyota Industrial Equipman Mfg. Inc., Raymond Corporation, Raymond-Muscatine, Inc., Lift, Inc., Pacific Rim Capital Inc., Alejandro Sachez Beltran, Hamilton Caster, Toyota Motor Corp., Toyota Industries, Corp., Toyota Forklifts, Toyota Material Handling USA, Inc., Toyota Industries North America, Respondents



ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 16th day of May, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.


Summaries of

Duty v. Toyota Advanced Logistics

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
May 16, 2022
278 A.3d 307 (Pa. 2022)
Case details for

Duty v. Toyota Advanced Logistics

Case Details

Full title:Patricia DUTY and Debra Miller, Individually and as Administrators of the…

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Date published: May 16, 2022

Citations

278 A.3d 307 (Pa. 2022)