Durrant v. State

Full title: MICHAEL DAVID AUGUST DURRANT, Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Mar 8, 2000

752 So. 2d 131 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. 3D99-2391.

Opinion filed March 8, 2000.

An appeal conducted pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Jerald Bagley, Judge, L.T. No. 97-35474.

Michael David August Durrant, in proper person.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before JORGENSON, COPE, and LEVY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We concur with appellate counsel that treatment of this appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), is appropriate in this case. By pro se brief appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence on count four. Assuming this challenge had been made with particularity in the trial court by motion for judgment of acquittal (it was not), it is nonetheless without merit. The evidence was legally sufficient to go to the jury. See State v. Law, 559 So.2d 187 (Fla. 1989).

Affirmed.