From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Duron v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 7, 1955
221 F.2d 187 (9th Cir. 1955)

Opinion

No. 14303.

April 7, 1955.

J.B. Tietz, Los Angeles, Cal., Hayden C. Covington, Brooklyn, N Y, for appellant.

Laughlin E. Waters, U.S. Atty., Hiram W. Kwan, Manley J. Bowler, Manuel L. Real, Louis Lee Abbott, Asst. U.S. Attys., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before STEPHENS and FEE, Circuit Judges, and WALSH, District Judge.


Appellant here contends that his conviction of violating the Universal Military Training and Service Act by knowingly failing and refusing to submit to induction into the armed forces of the United States must be reversed because the appeal board in his case failed to give him an opportunity to answer adverse recommendations of the Department of Justice before finally classifying him. Appellant's contention must be sustained. Gonzales v. United States, 75 S.Ct. 409; Bradley v. United States, 75 S.Ct. 532.

Accordingly, the judgment of the Court below is reversed.


Summaries of

Duron v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 7, 1955
221 F.2d 187 (9th Cir. 1955)
Case details for

Duron v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Earl Barton DURON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Apr 7, 1955

Citations

221 F.2d 187 (9th Cir. 1955)

Citing Cases

United States v. Jasmagy

Counsel for the Government points out, correctly, that had the defendant reported for induction when ordered,…