From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Durley v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Feb 1, 2000
24 S.W.3d 731 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. ED76221.

OPINION FILED: February 1, 2000.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY, HONORABLE MARK SEIGEL, JUDGE.

S. Paige Canfield, Public Defender, 1221 Locust Street, Suite 350, St. Louis, MO 63103, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Karen L. Kramer, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before: Gary M. Gaertner, P.J., Paul J. Simon, J., and James R. Dowd, J.



ORDER


Charles Durley appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without a hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Durley v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Feb 1, 2000
24 S.W.3d 731 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Durley v. State

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES DURLEY, APPELLANT, vs. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Feb 1, 2000

Citations

24 S.W.3d 731 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)