From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Durley v. Jeanpierre

United States District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin
Jun 12, 2023
No. 22-CV-1127 (E.D. Wis. Jun. 12, 2023)

Opinion

22-CV-1127

06-12-2023

TIMOTHY DURLEY, Plaintiff, v. CHERYL JEANPIERRE, Defendant.


ORDER

WILLIAM E. DUFFIN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On September 26, 2022, plaintiff Timothy Durley, who is incarcerated at Waupun Correctional Institution, filed a complaint under 42. U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1.) On January 27, 2023, Chief Judge Pamela Pepper allowed Durley to proceed in forma pauperis and screened his complaint. (ECF No. 17.) Durley was allowed to proceed on a First Amendment retaliation claim against the defendant. On March 7, 2023, because all parties consented to magistrate jurisdiction, this case was reassigned to this court. (ECF No. 21.)

On March 28, 2023, the defendant filed a motion to revoke Durley's in forma pauperis status and to stay the deadline to file an answer to the complaint. (ECF No. 23.) On May 2, 2023, the court granted the defendant's motion and revoked Durley's in forma pauperis status (ECF No. 28.) The court informed Durley that, in order to proceed with his case, he must pay the remaining balance of the full filing fee, $400.31, by June 2, 2023. The court cautioned Durley that failure to do so by the deadline will result in dismissal of his case.

The June 2, 2023, deadline has passed and Durley has not paid the remainder of the full filing fee. As such, his case is DISMISSED. The Clerk of Court will enter judgment accordingly.

This order and the judgment to follow are final. A dissatisfied party may appeal this court's decision to the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit by filing in this court a notice of appeal within 30 days of the entry of judgment. See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 3, 4. This court may extend this deadline if a party timely requests an extension and shows good cause or excusable neglect for not being able to meet the 30-day deadline. See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(5)(A).

Under certain circumstances, a party may ask this court to alter or amend its judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) or ask for relief from judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). Any motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) must be filed within 28 days of the entry of judgment. The court cannot extend this deadline. See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b)(2). Any motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) must be filed within a reasonable time, generally no more than one year after the entry of the judgment. The court cannot extend this deadline. See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b)(2).

A party is expected to closely review all applicable rules and determine what, if any, further action is appropriate.


Summaries of

Durley v. Jeanpierre

United States District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin
Jun 12, 2023
No. 22-CV-1127 (E.D. Wis. Jun. 12, 2023)
Case details for

Durley v. Jeanpierre

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY DURLEY, Plaintiff, v. CHERYL JEANPIERRE, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin

Date published: Jun 12, 2023

Citations

No. 22-CV-1127 (E.D. Wis. Jun. 12, 2023)