holding that the ALJ's failure to fully identify a depressive diagnosis is not reversible error because "the outcome of a case depends on the demonstration of functional limitations rather than a diagnosis . . . ."
Summary of this case from Wood v. SaulNo. 95-1687.
April 30, 1996.
Appeal from the E.D.Pa.
AFFIRMED.
holding that the ALJ's failure to fully identify a depressive diagnosis is not reversible error because "the outcome of a case depends on the demonstration of functional limitations rather than a diagnosis . . . ."
Summary of this case from Wood v. Saulfinding that a statement by a medical source that an individual is "disabled" is not dispositive
Summary of this case from HAGY v. APFELFull title:Durkin v. Major League Baseball
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Date published: Apr 30, 1996
Ultimately, the outcome of the case depends on the demonstration of the functional limitations of the…
Wrights v. ColvinUltimately, the outcome of the case depends on the demonstration of the functional limitations of the…