From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Durante v. Mezzetti

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
Jun 9, 1955
127 N.E.2d 309 (Mass. 1955)

Opinion

June 9, 1955.

Henry Gesmer, ( Marvin N. Geller with him,) for the plaintiffs.

Joseph A. Krichmar, (Louis A. George with him,) for the defendants.


Exceptions overruled. The defendants' demurrers to the plaintiffs' declaration in tort for deceit were sustained and the plaintiffs "granted 21 days in which to file a motion to amend." Such motion was filed with a copy of a proposed amended declaration and after hearing was denied. The plaintiffs excepted to the denial. The motion having been addressed to the discretion of the trial judge, its denial in the absence of findings, rulings, or requests for rulings presents no question of law. Means v. Leveroni, 297 Mass. 61, 64. Goodyear Park Co. v. Holyoke, 298 Mass. 510. Urban v. Central Massachusetts Electric Co. 301 Mass. 519, 524. Keljikian v. Star Brewing Co. 303 Mass. 53, 56. Peterson v. Cadogan, 313 Mass. 133, 134.


Summaries of

Durante v. Mezzetti

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
Jun 9, 1955
127 N.E.2d 309 (Mass. 1955)
Case details for

Durante v. Mezzetti

Case Details

Full title:JOHN DURANTE another vs. OLINDY MEZZETTI others

Court:Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts

Date published: Jun 9, 1955

Citations

127 N.E.2d 309 (Mass. 1955)
332 Mass. 758

Citing Cases

Reilly v. Revere Racing Association, Inc.

The motions having been addressed to the discretion of the trial judge, their denial in the absence of…

Keliher v. Champion

The motion was addressed to the discretion of the trial judge, and its denial, in the absence of findings,…