From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Duran v. ELG Parking Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 22, 2021
Civil Action 18 Civ. 6685 (GBD) (SLC) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 22, 2021)

Opinion

Civil Action 18 Civ. 6685 (GBD) (SLC)

12-22-2021

GERARDO MIGUEL BAEZ DURAN AND WILSON FRANCISCO SANCHEZ CRUZ, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. ELG PARKING INC. d/b/a ELG PARKING INC., et al., Defendants.


ORDER

SARAH L. CAVE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Neither of the parties appeared for the November 10, 2021 discovery status conference (ECF No. 108), and, noting that “[n]either of the parties has meaningfully moved forward this 2018 [lawsuit], ” the Court directed the parties to complete “all remaining fact discovery” by Wednesday, December 8, 2021, and to file a letter certifying the completion of fact discovery by December 10. (ECF No. 107). The parties have not responded to or complied with this Order, and the Court infers from their silence that fact discovery is complete.

The parties shall adhere to the Individual Rules and Practices of the Honorable George B. Daniels concerning the submission of a point pretrial order and dispositive motions, if any.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Duran v. ELG Parking Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 22, 2021
Civil Action 18 Civ. 6685 (GBD) (SLC) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 22, 2021)
Case details for

Duran v. ELG Parking Inc.

Case Details

Full title:GERARDO MIGUEL BAEZ DURAN AND WILSON FRANCISCO SANCHEZ CRUZ, individually…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 22, 2021

Citations

Civil Action 18 Civ. 6685 (GBD) (SLC) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 22, 2021)