Porter v. Goad, Ky., 404 S.W.2d 795. Obviously it did not. See Dupriest v. Tecon Corporation, Ky., 396 S.W.2d 778. The judgment is affirmed.
Conversely, if the strongest finding supported by the proof would be that the work was a possible factor, compensation has been denied. Kelly Contracting Co. v. Robinson, Ky., 377 S.W.2d 892 (1964); Dupriest v. Tecon Corp., Ky., 396 S.W.2d 778 (1965); Hutchinson v. Skilton Construction Co., Ky., 417 S.W.2d 142 (1967). OSBORNE, Judge (dissenting).
Therefore, neither the Board nor the circuit court had before it substantial and competent evidence required for "the proper apportionment of liability." Dupriest, et al v. Tecon Corporation, Ky., 396 S.W.2d 778. Even if it be conceded that there was a conflict in evidence before the Board (which we do not find) neither the circuit court nor this Court could determine the weight of that evidence.