Dupriest v. Tecon Corporation

3 Citing cases

  1. Isaacs v. Cedar Creek Mining Company

    432 S.W.2d 42 (Ky. Ct. App. 1968)

    Porter v. Goad, Ky., 404 S.W.2d 795. Obviously it did not. See Dupriest v. Tecon Corporation, Ky., 396 S.W.2d 778. The judgment is affirmed.

  2. Trailer Convoys, Inc. v. Holsclaw

    419 S.W.2d 563 (Ky. Ct. App. 1967)   Cited 3 times

    Conversely, if the strongest finding supported by the proof would be that the work was a possible factor, compensation has been denied. Kelly Contracting Co. v. Robinson, Ky., 377 S.W.2d 892 (1964); Dupriest v. Tecon Corp., Ky., 396 S.W.2d 778 (1965); Hutchinson v. Skilton Construction Co., Ky., 417 S.W.2d 142 (1967). OSBORNE, Judge (dissenting).

  3. Cabe v. Toler

    411 S.W.2d 41 (Ky. Ct. App. 1967)   Cited 6 times

    Therefore, neither the Board nor the circuit court had before it substantial and competent evidence required for "the proper apportionment of liability." Dupriest, et al v. Tecon Corporation, Ky., 396 S.W.2d 778. Even if it be conceded that there was a conflict in evidence before the Board (which we do not find) neither the circuit court nor this Court could determine the weight of that evidence.