From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dunn v. Jefferson Standard Life Ins. Co

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jan 19, 1942
123 F.2d 815 (Conn. Cir. Ct. 1942)

Opinion

No. 9950.

November 19, 1941. Motion to Retax Costs Denied January 19, 1942. See 125 F.2d 98.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Texas; Thomas M. Kennerly and James V. Allred, Judges.

Action between L.H. Dunn and others and the Jefferson Standard Life Insurance Company. From the judgment, the former appeal.

Affirmed.

Walter F. Brown, of Houston, Tex., for appellants.

Gaius G. Gannon, of Houston, Tex., for appellee.

Before HUTCHESON, HOLMES, and McCORD, Circuit Judges.


A careful examination of the entire record before the court without regard to "technical errors, defects, or exceptions which do not affect the substantial rights of the parties", as required by Section 391, 28 U.S.C.A., makes it clear that the proceedings in the court below were conducted in strict accordance with Rule 61, Federal Rules, Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, which requires "the court at every stage of the proceeding must disregard any error or defect * * * which does not affect the substantial rights of the parties", and that the judgment must be affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Dunn v. Jefferson Standard Life Ins. Co

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jan 19, 1942
123 F.2d 815 (Conn. Cir. Ct. 1942)
Case details for

Dunn v. Jefferson Standard Life Ins. Co

Case Details

Full title:DUNN et al. v. JEFFERSON STANDARD LIFE INS. CO

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Jan 19, 1942

Citations

123 F.2d 815 (Conn. Cir. Ct. 1942)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Killough

The specific action constituting error cannot be viewed in a vacuum; the entire record must be examined to…

Moore v. Louisville Nashville Railroad Co.

In the first place, the admission of this kind of evidence is largely within the discretion of the court.…