From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dunkley v. Shoemate

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jun 1, 1997
485 S.E.2d 295 (N.C. 1997)

Opinion

No. 28PA97

Filed 6 June 1997

On writ of certiorari pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-32(b) to review an order of the Court of Appeals, 121 N.C. App. 360, 465 S.E.2d 319 (1996), dismissing the plaintiff's appeal. Heard in the Supreme Court 14 May 1997.

Law Offices of Grover C. McCain, Jr., by Grover C. McCain, Jr., and Frank W. Hallstrom, for plaintiff-appellant.

Patterson, Dilthey, Clay Bryson, L.L.P., by Robert M. Clay, for defendant-appellee Shoemate.

Bailey Dixon, L.L.P., by Gary S. Parsons and Kenyann G. Brown, on behalf of Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company and the Alliance of American Insurers, amici curiae.


The interlocutory order of the superior court, from which the plaintiff appealed, affects a substantial right which the plaintiff will lose if the order is not reviewed before final judgment. Waters v. Qualified Personnel, Inc., 294 N.C. 200, 240 S.E.2d 338 (1977); Highway Commission v. Nuckles, 271 N.C. 1, 155 S.E.2d 772 (1967). It was error to dismiss the appeal. We reverse the order dismissing the appeal and remand to the Court of Appeals for a hearing on the merits.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.


Summaries of

Dunkley v. Shoemate

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jun 1, 1997
485 S.E.2d 295 (N.C. 1997)
Case details for

Dunkley v. Shoemate

Case Details

Full title:REBECCA DUNKLEY v. LEE H. SHOEMATE, ERIC B. MUNSON, DAVID S. JANOWSKY…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Jun 1, 1997

Citations

485 S.E.2d 295 (N.C. 1997)
485 S.E.2d 295

Citing Cases

Dunkley v. Shoemate

The Supreme Court remanded the case to this Court for a full hearing on the merits. Dunkley v. Shoemate, 346…

Dunkley v. Shoemate

However, on appeal, this Court held that "[t]he interlocutory order of the superior court . . . affects a…