From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dunaway v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jan 21, 2015
1:14-cv-1718 BAM (E.D. Cal. Jan. 21, 2015)

Opinion

          KAMALA D. HARRIS, State Bar No. 146672, Attorney General of California RENE L. LUCARIC, State Bar No. 180005, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, DAVID A. CARRASCO, State Bar No. 160460, Deputy Attorney General, Attorneys for Defendant California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

          BEN WILLIAMS, Jesse Ortiz Law Attorney for Plaintiff John Edward Dunaway


          STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

          Barbara A. McAuliffe, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

         The parties stipulate to extend the time for the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) to respond to Plaintiffs complaint. CDCR's response is currently due on January 26, 2015. But the case was just assigned to CDCR's counsel last week and he has not yet received documents needed for a proper review and response. Accordingly, the parties stipulate that CDCR shall have until February 27, 2015, to respond.

         ORDER

         Having reviewed the stipulation of the parties (Doc. 5), Defendant CDCR shall have until February 27, 2015, to file a response to Plaintiffs complaint.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Dunaway v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jan 21, 2015
1:14-cv-1718 BAM (E.D. Cal. Jan. 21, 2015)
Case details for

Dunaway v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation

Case Details

Full title:JOHN DUNAWAY, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 21, 2015

Citations

1:14-cv-1718 BAM (E.D. Cal. Jan. 21, 2015)