Dumas v. Crosby

Full title: RICHARD LEE DUMAS, Petitioner, v. JAMES CROSBY, JR., Respondent

Court: United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: Dec 2, 2005

Case No. 3:04cv15/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Dec. 2, 2005)

Opinion

Case No. 3:04cv15/MCR/EMT.

December 2, 2005

ORDER

M. RODGERS, Magistrate Judge

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated October 26, 2005. Petitioner has been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the report and recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED.

3. All pending motions are DENIED as moot.

4. The clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED