From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dulaney v. Coppard

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nov 18, 1944
145 F.2d 468 (5th Cir. 1944)

Opinion

No. 10878.

November 18, 1944.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Texas; Walter A. Keeling, Judge.

Proceeding in the matter of the bankruptcy of Albert Covington Dulaney, wherein M. Coppard was trustee. From an order sustaining an action of the referee in extending time for filing objections to discharge, the bankrupt appeals.

Affirmed.

Albert Covington Dulaney, of San Antonio, Tex., in pro. per.

Herbert Davis, of San Antonio, Tex., for appellee.

Before HUTCHESON, WALLER, and LEE, Circuit Judges.


The order appealed from was well within, and was a proper exercise of, the referee's authority. There is no merit whatever in the bankrupt's contention that the action of the referee in entering the extension order without first giving the bankrupt notice of his intention to enter it deprived the bankrupt of due process. The statute does not make notice to the bankrupt a condition of entering such orders. There is no evidence whatever that the entry of the order, without first notifying the bankrupt, deprived him of any constitutional right. The order appealed from is affirmed.


Summaries of

Dulaney v. Coppard

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nov 18, 1944
145 F.2d 468 (5th Cir. 1944)
Case details for

Dulaney v. Coppard

Case Details

Full title:DULANEY v. COPPARD

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Nov 18, 1944

Citations

145 F.2d 468 (5th Cir. 1944)

Citing Cases

In re Semel

Collier on Bankruptcy, 14th ed. Vol. 1, Par. 14.06, p. 1279. In the leading case of Dulaney v. Coppard, 145…

Texas N.O.R. Co. v. Phillips

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 6(b), 28 U.S.C.A., "Enlargement" "When by these rules or by a notice…