From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dukes v. Osborne

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION
Sep 30, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13cv232-TMH (M.D. Ala. Sep. 30, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13cv232-TMH

2013-09-30

J. W. DUKES, #156745, Plaintiff, v. C. O. JEROME OSBORNE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER AND OPINION

On July 29, 2013, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 10). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice and prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

_______________

TRUMAN M. HOBBS

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Dukes v. Osborne

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION
Sep 30, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13cv232-TMH (M.D. Ala. Sep. 30, 2013)
Case details for

Dukes v. Osborne

Case Details

Full title:J. W. DUKES, #156745, Plaintiff, v. C. O. JEROME OSBORNE, et al.…

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 30, 2013

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13cv232-TMH (M.D. Ala. Sep. 30, 2013)

Citing Cases

Dover v. Wilcox

" Bass v. Perrin, 170 F.3d 1312, 1318 (11th Cir. 1999).Dukes v. Osborne, 2013 WL 5493204 at * 1 (M.D. Ala.…