From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Duke v. Stokely-Bordo

Supreme Court of Florida
Apr 10, 1968
209 So. 2d 459 (Fla. 1968)

Opinion

No. 37057.

April 10, 1968.

Writ of Certiorari to the Florida Industrial Commission.

J. Mason Wines, of Stanley, Durrance, Woods Wines, Lakeland, for petitioner.

W.S. Crumbley, of Macfarlane, Ferguson, Allison Kelly, Tampa, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.


By petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date November 30, 1967.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, records and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petitions for certiorari and for attorney's fees are therefore denied.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, Acting C.J., and DREW, THORNAL, ERVIN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Duke v. Stokely-Bordo

Supreme Court of Florida
Apr 10, 1968
209 So. 2d 459 (Fla. 1968)
Case details for

Duke v. Stokely-Bordo

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH DUKE, PETITIONER, v. STOKELY-BORDO ET AL., RESPONDENTS

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Apr 10, 1968

Citations

209 So. 2d 459 (Fla. 1968)