From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dukas v. Davis Aircraft Products Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 8, 1986
123 A.D.2d 304 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

September 8, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Luciano, J.).


Order modified, as a matter of discretion, by deleting the provision thereof which granted the plaintiff's motion, and substituting therefor a provision denying said motion. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

A review of the record reveals that the plaintiff commenced this action on November 20, 1984. There followed protracted discovery proceedings, including demands for bills of particulars, interrogatories, the production of various documents, and appearances for depositions by appellants and respondent. On two separate occasions the appellants' counsel appeared before the Supreme Court for pretrial discovery conferences demanded by the plaintiff. Throughout these proceedings, Davis Aircraft and the individual defendants were represented by the same counsel. The record also reveals that the parties are involved in at least four related actions, two of which have been pending for several years. The plaintiff did not seek to have separate counsel designated until May and June of 1985 at which time she brought on the motion which is the subject of this appeal. Under the circumstances of this case, we substitute our discretion for that of Special Term by reversing the determination granting disqualification in view of the plaintiff's inordinate delay in seeking the instant relief, coupled with the fact that the parties have been actively involved in extensive pretrial proceedings and related actions without any formal request by the plaintiff that Davis Aircraft and the individual defendants be represented by separate counsel (see, Thomas Supply Equip. Co. v White Fathers, 53 A.D.2d 607; Solomon v Hirsch, 35 Misc.2d 716). Therefore, the appellants' counsel may continue to represent Davis Aircraft and the individual defendants in this case.

We agree, however, with the trial court's decision to deny the appellants' motion for summary judgment and adopt its reasoning with respect thereto. Lazer, J.P., Brown, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dukas v. Davis Aircraft Products Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 8, 1986
123 A.D.2d 304 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

Dukas v. Davis Aircraft Products Co., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:PAMELA L. DUKAS, Respondent, v. DAVIS AIRCRAFT PRODUCTS CO., INC., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 8, 1986

Citations

123 A.D.2d 304 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

Larsen v. Larsen

Thus, in Dukas v. Davis Aircraft Products Co., Inc., 129 Misc.2d 846, 494 N.Y.S.2d 632 [Supreme Court Suffolk…

Groysman v. Sibrizzi

Thus, the defendant has waived its right to seek disqualification of plaintiffs' counsel. Thomas Supply…