From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dudley v. Bunting

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Jan 10, 2014
Case No. 3:13-cv-58 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 10, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 3:13-cv-58

01-10-2014

RONALD E. DUDLEY, Petitioner, v. JASON BUNTING, Warden, Respondent.


Judge Timothy S. Black

Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz


DECISION AND ENTRY: (1) ADOPTING THE REPORTS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Docs. 14, 17, 22);

(2) OVERRULING PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS (Docs. 15, 19, 25);

(3) DISMISSING PETITIONER'S PETITION WITH PREJUDICE (Doc. 2);

(4) DENYING ANY REQUESTED CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY; AND

(5) CERTIFYING THAT APPEAL WOULD NOT BE TAKEN IN GOOD FAITH

This case is before the Court on the Reports and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz. (Docs. 14, 17, 22). The Magistrate Judge concludes that Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus should be dismissed with prejudice, that a certificate of appealability should be denied and that the Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. Petitioner filed Objections to the Reports and Recommendations. (Docs. 15, 19, 25). Respondent did not respond to Petitioner's Objections and the time for doing so has expired. The issues presented are now ripe for review.

As required by 29 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and has considered the issues presented de novo. Based upon the reasoning and citations of authority set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Reports and Recommendations (Docs. 14, 17, 22), the Court: (1) ADOPTS the Reports and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 2, 5) in their entirety; (2) OVERRULES Petitioner's Objections (Docs. 15, 19, 25); (3) DENIES and DISMISSES Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 2) with prejudice; (4) DENIES any request for a certificate of appealability under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); and (5) CERTIFIES that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and DENIES any request for leave to appeal in forma pauperis.

This case shall be TERMINATED on the Court's docket.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______

Timothy S. Black

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Dudley v. Bunting

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Jan 10, 2014
Case No. 3:13-cv-58 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 10, 2014)
Case details for

Dudley v. Bunting

Case Details

Full title:RONALD E. DUDLEY, Petitioner, v. JASON BUNTING, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 10, 2014

Citations

Case No. 3:13-cv-58 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 10, 2014)

Citing Cases

State v. Dudley

{¶ 4} The record establishes that on January 10, 2014, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of…