Opinion
18-CV-6010L
11-05-2018
MARK T. DUBLINO, Plaintiff, v. JAMES THOMAS, et al., Defendants.
DECISION & ORDER
On January 4, 2018, pro se plaintiff Mark T. Dublino ("plaintiff") commenced this action against the defendants pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging claims for excessive force and failure to protect in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (Docket # 12). Currently pending before this Court is plaintiff's third motion seeking appointment of counsel. (Docket # 30). On October 26, 2018, this Court issued a Decision & Order denying plaintiff's previous requests for appointment of counsel. (Docket ## 24, 25, 29). Plaintiff's current motion does not present any new information to alter this Court's previous determination. Accordingly, for the reasons previously stated in my October 26, 2018 Decision & Order (Docket # 29), plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel (Docket # 30) is DENIED without prejudice at this time. It is the plaintiff's responsibility to retain an attorney or press forward with this lawsuit pro se. 28 U.S.C. § 1654.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Marian W . Payson
MARIAN W. PAYSON
United States Magistrate Judge Dated: Rochester, New York
November 5, 2018