From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dublin v. Prime

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 24, 1990
168 A.D.2d 597 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

December 24, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bellard, J.).


Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

We find that the appeal must be dismissed because the appellant is not aggrieved by the dismissal of the plaintiff's complaint against his codefendant, McNeilab, Inc. (see, CPLR 5511; Hauser v. North Rockland Cent. School Dist. No. 1, 166 A.D.2d 553). Eiber, J.P., Sullivan, Balletta and O'Brien, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dublin v. Prime

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 24, 1990
168 A.D.2d 597 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Dublin v. Prime

Case Details

Full title:JENNIFER DUBLIN et al., Plaintiffs, v. CHESTER PRIME, Appellant, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 24, 1990

Citations

168 A.D.2d 597 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
563 N.Y.S.2d 434

Citing Cases

Wilcox Development Corp. v. City of New York

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements. The appellant is not aggrieved by the…

Schultz v. Excelsior Orthopaedics, LLP

Connors & Vilardo, LLP, Buffalo (Lawrence J. Vilardo of Counsel), for Defendants–Appellants. Roach, Brown,…