From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Duarte v. City of N.Y.

Court of Appeals of New York
Mar 21, 2013
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 1871 (N.Y. 2013)

Opinion

No. 54

03-21-2013

In the Matter of Arisleda Duarte, Respondent, v. City of New York, Appellant.

Fay Ng, for appellant. Valentina M. Morales, for respondent. Columbia Law School Prisoners and Families Clinic of Morningside Heights Legal Services; Prisoners' Rights Project of the New York City Legal Aid Society, amici curiae.


Fay Ng, for appellant.

Valentina M. Morales, for respondent.

Columbia Law School Prisoners and Families Clinic of Morningside Heights Legal Services; Prisoners' Rights Project of the New York City Legal Aid Society, amici curiae.

MEMORANDUM:

The appeal should be dismissed, without costs, as moot.

Respondent City of New York has asked us to review whether it was error for the Appellate Division to conclude that it was arbitrary and capricious for the New York City Department of Correction to deny petitioner's application to enter the nursery program at the Rose M. Singer Center at Rikers Island. We agree with petitioner that this proceeding is moot because her child is now of an age that renders him ineligible for participation in the nursery program pursuant to Correction Law § 611. Moreover, in light of the Department of Correction's revised Nursery Order, effective February 11, 2013, we decline to invoke the mootness exception (see Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714-715 [1980]).

Appeal dismissed, without costs, as moot, in a memorandum. Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Rivera concur.


Summaries of

Duarte v. City of N.Y.

Court of Appeals of New York
Mar 21, 2013
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 1871 (N.Y. 2013)
Case details for

Duarte v. City of N.Y.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Arisleda Duarte, Respondent, v. City of New York…

Court:Court of Appeals of New York

Date published: Mar 21, 2013

Citations

2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 1871 (N.Y. 2013)