From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Duane v. Frink

United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Oxford Division
Sep 3, 2021
3:21CV149-MPM-JMV (N.D. Miss. Sep. 3, 2021)

Opinion

3:21CV149-MPM-JMV

09-03-2021

MICHAEL DUANE PETITIONER v. MARTIN L. FRINK RESPONDENT


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

MICHAEL P. MILLS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The court takes up, sua sponte, the dismissal of this cause. On July 6, 2021, the court entered an order requiring the petitioner to either pay the filing fee in this case or to complete and return the forms necessary to proceed as a pauper. The court cautioned the petitioner that failure to comply with the order would result in the dismissal of this case without prejudice. The petitioner has filed two documents the court construed as supplements to his petition; however, neither document constituted compliance with the court's order. Thus, the petitioner has failed to comply with the court's order, and the deadline to do so passed on July 27, 2021. This case is therefore DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with an order of the court under FED. R. CIV. P. 41(B).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Duane v. Frink

United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Oxford Division
Sep 3, 2021
3:21CV149-MPM-JMV (N.D. Miss. Sep. 3, 2021)
Case details for

Duane v. Frink

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL DUANE PETITIONER v. MARTIN L. FRINK RESPONDENT

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Oxford Division

Date published: Sep 3, 2021

Citations

3:21CV149-MPM-JMV (N.D. Miss. Sep. 3, 2021)