From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Duan v. Holm

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 19, 2011
No. 11-CV-12408 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 19, 2011)

Opinion

No. 11-CV-12408

09-19-2011

NINA DUAN, Plaintiff, v. ERIC HOLM, Defendant.


Hon.

JUDGMENT


At a session of said Court, held in

the U.S. Courthouse, Detroit, Michigan

on _September 19, 2011_


PRESENT: Honorable

United States District Chief Judge

The Court having this date entered an Opinion and Order, granting Plaintiff's Motion to amend her Complaint, granting Defendant's Motion to dismiss Plaintiff's federal claim, and declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's remaining state law claim,

NOW, THEREFORE,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiff's claim of discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended be, and hereby is, DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE.

The Court having declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's remaining state law claim, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c),

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiff's claim of discrimination under the Michigan Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act be, and hereby, is REMANDED to the Wayne County Circuit Court.

Gerald E. Rosen

Chief Judge, United States District Court
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on September 19, 2011, by electronic and/or ordinary mail to Nina Duan, 1276 Hendrie Drive,

Canton, MI 48187.

Felicia Moses for Ruth A. Gunther

Case Manager


Summaries of

Duan v. Holm

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 19, 2011
No. 11-CV-12408 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 19, 2011)
Case details for

Duan v. Holm

Case Details

Full title:NINA DUAN, Plaintiff, v. ERIC HOLM, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 19, 2011

Citations

No. 11-CV-12408 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 19, 2011)