From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

D'Ropshitz v. Schwartz

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Sep 16, 2015
131 A.D.3d 1056 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

2015-09-16

In the Matter of Zera Kodesh D'ROPSHITZ, respondent, v. Joseph Aryeh SCHWARTZ, et al., appellants.

MC Shapiro Law Group, P.C., Brooklyn, N.Y. (Mitchell C. Shapiro and Jacob H. Nemon of counsel), for appellants. Jacob Zelmanovitz, Brooklyn, N.Y., for respondent.


MC Shapiro Law Group, P.C., Brooklyn, N.Y. (Mitchell C. Shapiro and Jacob H. Nemon of counsel), for appellants. Jacob Zelmanovitz, Brooklyn, N.Y., for respondent.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to confirm an arbitration award dated July 2, 2013, Joseph Aryeh Schwartz and Rosie Schwartz, also known as Rosa Schwartz, appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Partnow, J.), dated June 24, 2014, which, inter alia, confirmed the award in part.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The appellants contend that after issuing an arbitration award dated August 20, 2012, the subject arbitration panel did not have jurisdiction to issue an arbitration award dated July 2, 2013. However, by alerting the arbitration panel that the August 20, 2012, award had left an issue unresolved, and subsequently meeting with the panel and suggesting that the panel members visit the subject site so that they might have a better understanding of the issue, the appellants participated in the proceedings which led to the July 2, 2013, award and, thereby, waived any argument that the arbitration panel exceeded its authority or was without jurisdiction ( see Binghamton Civ. Serv. Forum v. City of Binghamton, 44 N.Y.2d 23, 29 n., 403 N.Y.S.2d 482, 374 N.E.2d 380; see also Stone v. Noble Constr. Mgt., Inc., 116 A.D.3d 838, 839, 983 N.Y.S.2d 417; cf. Matter of New York State Dept. of Corr. Servs. [New York State Corr. Officers & Police Benevolent Assn., Inc.], 100 A.D.3d 1066, 1068, 953 N.Y.S.2d 351).

The appellants' contention that the petitioner did not timely seek confirmation of the award is without merit ( see Matter of Track Artist Mgt. v. Quigley, 309 A.D.2d 680, 766 N.Y.S.2d 345).

The appellants' remaining contention is without merit. DILLON, J.P., CHAMBERS, HALL and DUFFY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

D'Ropshitz v. Schwartz

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Sep 16, 2015
131 A.D.3d 1056 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

D'Ropshitz v. Schwartz

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Zera Kodesh D'ROPSHITZ, respondent, v. Joseph Aryeh…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Sep 16, 2015

Citations

131 A.D.3d 1056 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
131 A.D.3d 1056
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 6814

Citing Cases

Subway Surface Supervisors Ass'n v.

Dist., 23 N.Y.3d 251, 261, 990 N.Y.S.2d 442, 13 N.E.3d 1028 [citations and internal quotation marks omitted];…