Opinion
No. 09-CV-134-AC
02-06-2012
KEITH L. DROLLINGER, Plaintiff, v. SUSAN R. GERBER, HARDY MYERS, and JOHN KROGER, Defendants.
Keith L. Drollinger, Pro se Pro se Plaintiff Michael R Washington OREGON DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Trial Division Attorney for Defendants
Keith L. Drollinger, Pro se
Pro se Plaintiff
Michael R Washington
OREGON DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Trial Division
Attorney for Defendants
ORDER
HERNANDEZ, District Judge:
Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta issued a Findings and Recommendation (doc. #78) on November 12, 2011, in which he recommends that I grant the motion for summary judgment (doc. #47) filed by defendants.
Plaintiff Keith L. Drollinger ("Plaintiff") timely filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).
I have carefully considered Plaintiff's objections and conclude that the objections do not provide a basis to modify the Findings and Recommendation. I have also reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and find no error in the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation (doc. #78). Defendants' motion for summary judgment (doc. #47) is therefore granted.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
______________________
Marco A. Hernandez
United States District Judge