From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Droddy v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Aug 7, 2024
No. 09-24-00190-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 7, 2024)

Opinion

09-24-00190-CR

08-07-2024

ROBERT TIMOTHY DRODDY JR., Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


Do Not Publish

Submitted on August 6, 2024.

On Appeal from the 128th District Court Orange County, Texas Trial Cause No. A230193-R.

Before Golemon, C.J., Johnson and Wright, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Although Robert Timothy Droddy Jr. filed a notice of appeal, he failed to arrange to pay for the clerk's record. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(a)(2). On June 14, 2024, the Clerk of the Court notified the parties that unless Droddy arranged to file the clerk's record or explained why he needed additional time to do so, his appeal in Trial Court Cause Number A230193-R would be dismissed for want of prosecution. The Court, however, has not received a response.

Retained counsel represents Droddy in his appeal. Droddy has also not filed an affidavit of indigence, and nothing in the appellate record shows that Droddy is entitled to proceed without paying costs. See id. 20.2.

Because Droddy has not explained why he failed to file the record in his appeal, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See id. 37.3(b), 43.2(f).

APPEAL DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Droddy v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Aug 7, 2024
No. 09-24-00190-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 7, 2024)
Case details for

Droddy v. State

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT TIMOTHY DRODDY JR., Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont

Date published: Aug 7, 2024

Citations

No. 09-24-00190-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 7, 2024)