From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Driver v. Avalos

United States District Court, Northern District of California
May 29, 2024
23-cv-03696-JD (N.D. Cal. May. 29, 2024)

Opinion

23-cv-03696-JD

05-29-2024

BILLY DRIVER, Plaintiff, v. AVALOS. Defendant.


ORDER RE DISMISSAL

JAMES DONATO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). Plaintiff's motion to proceed IFP was dismissed after the Court found that plaintiff was three-strikes barred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Dkt. No. 21. Plaintiff was provided twenty-eight days to pay the full filing fee, four hundred and five dollars, or the case would be dismissed. The time to pay has passed and plaintiff has not paid the fee. Consequently, the case is dismissed without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Driver v. Avalos

United States District Court, Northern District of California
May 29, 2024
23-cv-03696-JD (N.D. Cal. May. 29, 2024)
Case details for

Driver v. Avalos

Case Details

Full title:BILLY DRIVER, Plaintiff, v. AVALOS. Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: May 29, 2024

Citations

23-cv-03696-JD (N.D. Cal. May. 29, 2024)