From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Driskell v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Jan 13, 2009
276 S.W.3d 862 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)

Opinion

No. WD69383.

January 13, 2009.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Pettis County, Missouri, Robert Lawrence Koffman, Judge.

Mark A. Grothoff, Columbia, MO, for Appellant.

Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

Before THOMAS H. NEWTON, C.J., JAMES M. SMART, JR., and JAMES EDWARD WELSH, JJ.

Prior report: 223 S.W.3d 857.


ORDER

Anthony Driskell appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 post-conviction relief motion without an evidentiary hearing. He challenges the motion court's ruling that trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to file a motion to suppress incriminating evidence and failing to object to the admission of this evidence at trial.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Driskell v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Jan 13, 2009
276 S.W.3d 862 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)
Case details for

Driskell v. State

Case Details

Full title:Anthony D. DRISKELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District

Date published: Jan 13, 2009

Citations

276 S.W.3d 862 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)