From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Driessen v. Woodforect Nat'l Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Mar 8, 2013
Case No. 3:12-cv-91 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 8, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 3:12-cv-91

03-08-2013

ROCHELLE DRIESSEN, Plaintiff, v. WOODFORECT NATIONAL BANK, Defendant.


JUDGE WALTER H. RICE


DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. #43); OVERRULING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS THERETO (DOC. #44); SUSTAINING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR ORDER CERTIFYING THAT APPEAL IS NOT TAKEN IN GOOD FAITH AND DENYING IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS ON APPEAL (DOC. #42); INSTRUCTIONS TO CLERK OF COURT

Based on the reasoning and citations of authority set forth in the United States Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. #43), issued February 25, 2013, as well as upon a thorough de novo review of this Court's file and the applicable law, this Court ADOPTS said judicial filing in its entirety, and OVERRULES Plaintiff's Objections thereto (Doc. #44).

The Court SUSTAINS Defendant's Motion for Order Certifying that Appeal is Not Taken in Good Faith. Doc. #42. Plaintiff is therefore denied the right to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 24(a)(4)(B), the Clerk of Court shall so notify the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals.

______________

WALTER H. RICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Driessen v. Woodforect Nat'l Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Mar 8, 2013
Case No. 3:12-cv-91 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 8, 2013)
Case details for

Driessen v. Woodforect Nat'l Bank

Case Details

Full title:ROCHELLE DRIESSEN, Plaintiff, v. WOODFORECT NATIONAL BANK, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 8, 2013

Citations

Case No. 3:12-cv-91 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 8, 2013)