From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Drevaleva v. Mcdonough

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 17, 2023
22-cv-04995-HSG (N.D. Cal. Feb. 17, 2023)

Opinion

22-cv-04995-HSG

02-17-2023

TATYANA EVGENIEVNA DREVALEVA, Plaintiff, v. DENIS RICHARD MCDONOUGH, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE OBJECTIONS RE: DKT. NOS. 24, 29

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Kim's Report and Recommendation, as well as objections to the Report. The Court finds the Report correct, well-reasoned and thorough, and adopts it in every respect. Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE based on res judicata. Plaintiff has also filed a motion to extend her objection deadline, stating she has not had enough time to respond. See Dkt. No. 29. But before filing her motion to extend, Plaintiff filed two motions, see Dkt. Nos. 27, 28, which are, in essence, objections to the Report and comprise dozens of pages of argument and hundreds of pages of exhibits. These filings undermine any argument that Plaintiff did not have time object, and regardless, the Court construes these filings as objections and has considered them. Plaintiff's motion to extend the deadline is DENIED. Dkt. No. 29. This order terminates Dkt. Nos. 27 and 28. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendants and close the case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Drevaleva v. Mcdonough

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 17, 2023
22-cv-04995-HSG (N.D. Cal. Feb. 17, 2023)
Case details for

Drevaleva v. Mcdonough

Case Details

Full title:TATYANA EVGENIEVNA DREVALEVA, Plaintiff, v. DENIS RICHARD MCDONOUGH, et…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Feb 17, 2023

Citations

22-cv-04995-HSG (N.D. Cal. Feb. 17, 2023)