From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Drennon v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Oct 18, 2012
No. 3:12-00924 (M.D. Tenn. Oct. 18, 2012)

Opinion

No. 3:12-00924

10-18-2012

JOE BRISCOE DRENNON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA


JUDGE CAMPBELL


ORDER

Pending before the Court is Motion Of The United States For An Order Finding That Petitioner Has Waived The Attorney-Client Privilege (Docket No. 13). Through the Motion, the Government requests that the Court enter an order holding that the attorney-client privilege has been waived in Petitioner's criminal case because he has alleged in his Section 2255 Motion that trial counsel provided ineffective assistance.

The Motion is GRANTED. The Court holds that the Petitioner has waived the attorney-client privilege as to the matters raised in his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. See, e.g., In re Lott, 424 F.3d 446, 453 (6th Cir. 2005)(Explaining that a habeas petitioner implicitly waives the attorney-client privilege by putting his attorney's performance at issue, and waiver extends to those matters relevant to petitioners's ineffective assistance of counsel claims).

It is so ORDERED.

________

TODD J. CAMPBELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Drennon v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Oct 18, 2012
No. 3:12-00924 (M.D. Tenn. Oct. 18, 2012)
Case details for

Drennon v. United States

Case Details

Full title:JOE BRISCOE DRENNON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Oct 18, 2012

Citations

No. 3:12-00924 (M.D. Tenn. Oct. 18, 2012)