From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Drake v. Mercedes Benz USA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION
Jan 23, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:16-CV-1228 (W.D. La. Jan. 23, 2018)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:16-CV-1228

01-23-2018

ERIC DRAKE v. MERCEDES BENZ USA, ET AL


MAG. JUDGE WHITEHURST

JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, determining that the findings are correct under the applicable law, and noting the absence of objections to the Report and Recommendation in the record,

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 42], joined by Defendant Autohaus LLC [Doc. No. 44], is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's claims against Mercedes Benz USA and Autohaus LLC are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 23rd day of January, 2018.

/s/ _________

ROBERT G. JAMES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Drake v. Mercedes Benz USA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION
Jan 23, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:16-CV-1228 (W.D. La. Jan. 23, 2018)
Case details for

Drake v. Mercedes Benz USA

Case Details

Full title:ERIC DRAKE v. MERCEDES BENZ USA, ET AL

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION

Date published: Jan 23, 2018

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:16-CV-1228 (W.D. La. Jan. 23, 2018)

Citing Cases

Diece-Lisa Indus. v. Disney Store U.S., L.L.C.

Further, case law from other courts applying Fifth Circuit law support the conclusion that the "arises out of…